Rick Drummond v. City of Brunswick, Georgia , 138 F. App'x 296 ( 2005 )

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 05-11127 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar June 29, 2005
________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN
D. C. Docket No. 03-00191-CV-2
RICK DRUMMOND,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF BRUNSWICK, GEORGIA,
BRADFORD S. BROWN, In his official
capacity as Mayor of the City of Brunswick,
Georgia, and in his individual capacity, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
__________________________
(June 29, 2005)
Before CARNES, MARCUS and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Rick Drummond (Plaintiff) filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City
of Brunswick, Georgia, Bradford S. Brown, and Roosevelt Harris, Jr. (Defendants).
The district court dismissed the Plaintiff's substantive due process claim against
all Defendants, and the procedural due process claims against the City, pursuant to
the Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion. (R.1-25.) Thereafter, the court
dismissed the Plaintiff's procedural due process claims and state law claim for
intentional infliction of emotional distress against Brown and Harris on these
Defendants' Rule 56 motion for summary judgment, thereby disposing of all
remaining claims. (R.2-68.) The Plaintiff appeals.
The Plaintiff contends that the district court erred: (1) in dismissing the
substantive due process claims; (2) in granting summary judgment on the procedural
due process claims; and (3) in granting summary judgment on the state law claim.
We discern no reversible error. All claims were properly dismissed for the
reasons stated in the district court's orders referenced in this opinion.
AFFIRMED.
2