[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
September 30, 2002
THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
No. 98-6222
FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
GULF POWER COMPANY;
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, et al.,
Petitioners,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and
UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
No. 98-6414
FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA,
Respondents.
____________
No. 98-6430
____________
FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
_____________
No. 98-6431
_____________
FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
2
________________
No. 98-6442
________________
FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, d.b.a. AMERENUE,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
_________________
No. 98-6458
_________________
FCC Docket No. 97-151-CS
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICES CORPORATION,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and
UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
3
_________________
No. 98-6476
__________________
FCC Docket No. 97-151
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and
UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
____________
No. 98-6477
____________
FCC Docket No. 97-151
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC and POWER COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
4
______________
No. 98-6478
______________
FCC Docket No. 97-151
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and
UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
_______________
No. 98-6485
________________
FCC Docket No. 97-151
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
5
________________
No. 98-6486
_________________
FCC Docket No. 97-151
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
______________
No. 98-2589
_______________
FCC Docket No. 97-151
TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
6
____________
No. 98-4675
_____________
FCC Docket No. 98-20
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,
Petitioner,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES,
Respondents.
Petitions for Review of Orders
of the Federal Communications Commission
(September 30, 2002)
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and GARWOOD*, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In Gulf Power Co. v. FCC,
208 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2000), we considered
an attack on the FCC’s 1998 regulations, Report and Order, 13 F.C.C.R. 6777,
1998 WL 46987, promulgated pursuant to the 1996 amendments to the Pole
Attachment Act,
47 U.S.C. § 244(f) (Supp. II 1996). We held that the facial
_________________
*Honorable Will L. Garwood, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.
7
validity of the rent formula developed by the FCC was not ripe for review, but that
the FCC lacked statutory authority to regulate the wireless carriers and the
provision of the Internet service under the 1996 Act. Gulf Power,
208 F.3d at
1279. The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the latter determination. See
National Cable & Telecommunications Association, Inc. v. Gulf Power Co.,
534
U.S. 327,
122 S. Ct. 882,
151 L. Ed. 794 (2002). Accordingly, the FCC Order is
reinstated.
SO ORDERED.
8
