Com. v. Fetterolf, J. ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • J.S22032/16 & J.S22033/16
    NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA         :     IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
    :           PENNSYLVANIA
    :
    v.                  :
    :
    JOSHUA BRIAN FETTEROLF,              :
    :
    Appellant          :     No. 1016 MDA 2015
    Appeal from the Order Entered May 13, 2015
    In the Court of Common Pleas of Union County
    Civil Division No(s): CP-60-MD-0000109-2015
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA         :     IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
    :           PENNSYLVANIA
    :
    v.                  :
    :
    JOSHUA BRIAN FETTEROLF,              :
    :
    Appellant          :     No. 1017 MDA 2015
    Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence May 13, 2015
    In the Court of Common Pleas of Union County
    Criminal Division No(s): CP-60-MD-0000340-2014
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA         :     IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
    :           PENNSYLVANIA
    :
    v.                  :
    :
    JOSHUA BRIAN FETTEROLF,              :
    :
    Appellant          :     No. 1645 MDA 2015
    Appeal from the Order Entered July 21, 2015
    In the Court of Common Pleas of Union County
    Civil Division No(s): CP-60-MD-0000145-2015
    J.S22032/16 & J.S22033/16
    BEFORE:    MUNDY, J., DUBOW, J., and STRASSBURGER, J.*
    CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.:                FILED MAY 19, 2016
    I join the Majority Memorandum insofar as it affirms Appellant’s
    indirect criminal contempt conviction arising out of the letter referenced at
    Paragraph 3A.
    I reluctantly concur in the result reached by the Majority in reversing
    Appellant’s conviction for indirect criminal contempt arising out of his
    attempted communication with his wife via Ms. Pamela Klinger, the
    corrections officer. The trial court properly found that Appellant attempted
    to contact his wife.   Had the trial court convicted Appellant of criminal
    attempt, we would affirm. In Commonwealth v. Sims, 
    919 A.2d 931
     (Pa.
    2007), our Supreme Court held that an attempted crime is a lesser included
    offense of the completed crime.    Thus, even though not charged with the
    attempted crime, Appellant could have been convicted of such.
    However, where a defendant does not complete the crime, he cannot
    be convicted of the completed crime, as was Appellant and the defendant in
    Commonwealth v. Tate, 
    816 A.2d 1097
     (Pa. 2003), where our Supreme
    Court reversed the conviction and this Court. I therefore concur.
    *Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1016 MDA 2015

Filed Date: 5/19/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/19/2016