Jesse F. Bowers v. MO State Employees' ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    _____________
    No. 96-3185WM
    _____________
    Jesse F. Bowers,                      *
    *
    Appellant,         *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                               * District Court for the Western
    * District of Missouri.
    Missouri State Employees’             *
    Retirement System Board of            *        [UNPUBLISHED]
    Trustees,                             *
    *
    Appellee.          *
    _____________
    Submitted:   May 23, 1997
    Filed: June 3, 1997
    _____________
    Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
    _____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Jesse F. Bowers brought this action against the Missouri State
    Employees' Retirement System Board of Trustees (MOSERS) claiming violations
    of his federal constitutional rights because MOSERS misinterpreted a
    Missouri statute that increased Bowers's retirement benefits and a state
    court ruled that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction instead of reaching
    the merits of Bowers's claims for declaratory relief.
    Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the
    district court correctly dismissed Bowers's complaint for failure to state
    a claim under federal law. See Charchenko v. City of Stillwater, 
    47 F.3d 981
    , 983 (8th Cir. 1995); Chesterfield Dev. Corp. v. City of Chesterfield,
    
    963 F.2d 1102
    , 1105 (8th Cir. 1992). Likewise, the district court did not
    abuse its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction
    over Bowers's state law claims. See Willman v. Heartland Hosp. East, 
    34 F.3d 605
    , 613 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 
    115 S. Ct. 1361
    (1995).
    We affirm the district court.     See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    MOSERS's motion for damages and costs is denied.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-