Chazin v. Brooks ( 2008 )

Opinions of the United
2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
4-28-2008
Chazin v. Brooks
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
Docket No. 07-1068
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008
Recommended Citation
"Chazin v. Brooks" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 1320.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/1320
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 07-1068
_____________
BARRY CHAZIN,
Appellant
v.
MARILYN BROOKS; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF
THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
_______________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. No. 06-cv-02566)
District Judge: Honorable James T. Giles
Argued April 16, 2008
Before: SLOVITER, JORDAN, and ALARCÓN*, Circuit Judges
JUDGMENT ORDER
After consideration of the briefs and oral argument in the above case, the
appeal is dismissed because appellant has failed to state a valid claim of the denial of a
constitutional right. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000).
By the Court,
/s/ Dolores K. Sloviter
Circuit Judge
* Honorable Arthur L. Alarcón, Senior Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Chazin v. DA Philadelphia City et al.
07-1068
Page 2
Attest:
/s/Marcia M. Waldron
Clerk
Dated: April 28, 2008
smw/cc: Michael J. Kelly, Esq.
Joshua S. Goldwert, Esq.