Freeman v. NC Department Corr ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 98-7439
    DARYL K. FREEMAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
    CAPTAIN MCHEE, employed of Odom Correctional
    Institution; SERGEANT ASKEW, employed at Odom
    Correctional Institution; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
    BLYTHE, employed at Odom Correctional Institu-
    tion; OFFICER WIGGINS, Correctional officer
    employed at Odom Correctional Institution;
    MOSLEY, Correctional Officer employed at Odom
    Correctional Institution; DEBERRY, Nurse,
    employed at Odom Correctional Institution;
    BERTHA THOMPSON, Nurse, employed at Odom Cor-
    rectional Institution; DOCTOR ANDERSON, Medi-
    cal Physician employed at Odom Correctional
    Institution,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
    trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
    (CA-96-968-5-CT-F2)
    Submitted:   December 17, 1998             Decided:   January 11, 1999
    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Daryl K. Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Coull Wilson, Associate
    Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Daryl K. Freeman appeals the district court’s order denying
    relief on his 
    42 U.S.C.A. § 1983
     (West Supp. 1998) complaint.   We
    have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
    no reversible error.   Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
    the district court.    See Freeman v. North Carolina Department of
    Corrections, No. CA-96-968-5-CT-F2 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 20, 1998).    We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 98-7439

Filed Date: 1/11/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021