United States v. Clarence O'Neal , 276 F. App'x 544 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 07-2634
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the
    * Western District of Missouri.
    Clarence O’Neal,                        *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: March 27, 2008
    Filed: May 8, 2008
    ___________
    Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Federal inmate Clarence O’Neal appeals the district court’s1 order committing
    him under 18 U.S.C. § 4245, which provides for the hospitalization of an imprisoned
    person suffering from a mental disease or defect, until he no longer needs treatment
    or his prison sentence expires, whichever occurs first. Following careful review, we
    conclude that the district court’s section 4245 finding was supported by the unrefuted
    1
    The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
    James C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
    Missouri.
    opinion of the mental health professionals at the United States Medical Center for
    Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri, and was not clearly erroneous,
    notwithstanding O’Neal’s denial of mental illness and the inability of defense
    counsel’s separate examiner to offer a diagnostic impression. See 18 U.S.C. § 4245(d)
    (determination of mental illness and treatment need, and burden of proof); United
    States v. Bean, 
    373 F.3d 877
    , 879 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review); United States
    v. Eckerson, 
    299 F.3d 913
    , 914-15 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (upholding
    commitment order based on opinion of prison hospital staff, despite inmate’s denial
    of mental illness).
    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel’s
    motion to withdraw on condition that counsel inform appellant about the procedures
    for filing petitions for rehearing and for certiorari.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-2634

Citation Numbers: 276 F. App'x 544

Filed Date: 5/8/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023