United States v. Monique Arp ( 2016 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7593
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MONIQUE MICHELLE ARP,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:13-cr-00230-RBH-1)
Submitted: February 5, 2016 Decided: February 10, 2016
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monique Michelle Arp, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Monique Michelle Arp appeals the district court’s order
denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction based on U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, App. C,
Amend. 782 (2015). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error because Arp’s sentence was the result of a Fed.
R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement. Arp’s stipulated sentence
was not based on the Sentencing Guidelines, so Amendment 782 does
not apply. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Arp, No. 4:13-cr-00230-RBH-1
(D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2