Annmarie Serem v. Commissioner, Soc Sec ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-1518
    ANNMARIE SEREM,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Aiken.   J. Michelle Childs, District Judge.
    (1:13-cv-02705-JMC)
    Submitted:   January 28, 2016               Decided:   February 26, 2016
    Before AGEE and      DIAZ,   Circuit   Judges,   and   HAMILTON,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    W. Daniel Mayes, SMITH, MASSEY, BRODIE, GUYNN & MAYES, P.A.,
    Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellant.       William N. Nettles,
    United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Molly E.
    Carter,   Special  Assistant   United  States   Attorney,  SOCIAL
    SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Annmarie Serem appeals the district court’s order accepting
    the   magistrate        judge’s      recommendation     and    upholding   the
    Commissioner’s     denial       of      her   application     for   disability
    insurance     benefits.           Our    review   of    the    Commissioner’s
    determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are
    supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law
    was applied.     See Mascio v. Colvin, 
    780 F.3d 632
    , 634 (4th Cir.
    2015).      We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, the
    administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no
    reversible error.        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
    judgment.      Serem v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 1:13-cv-
    02705-JMC     (D.S.C.    Mar.     30,    2015).    We   dispense    with   oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-1518

Filed Date: 2/26/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021