Rodriguez v. Walters, No. Cv94 041 61 09 (Nov. 21, 1995) , 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 13222 ( 1995 )

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]ORDER Judgment is denied and the default is set aside pursuant to Practice Book § 363A since the defendants filed an answer in September. See Snow v. Calise, 174 Conn. 567, 574 (1978). The defendants Marie and Stephanie Walters are advised to retain a lawyer since they are not defending this most serious matter with due diligence.

BY THE COURT,

LEVIN, JUDGE