Barbour v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. , 264 A.D. 824 ( 1942 )


Menu:
  • —• Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to resettle a previous order which denies defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint in a silicosis action.) Present —• Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 264 A.D. 824

Filed Date: 5/6/1942

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023