State v. Ellis, No. Cr91-196561 (Oct. 27, 1998) , 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 12333 ( 1998 )

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CT Page 12334 Date of Sentence: May 13, 1993 Date of Application: June 9, 1993 Date of Application Filed: June 9, 1993 Date of Decision: October 22, 1998

Application for review of sentence imposed by the Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury.

Docket No. CR91-196561

Karen Diebolt, Esquire Defense Counsel, for PetitionerSandra Tullius, Esquire Assistant State's Attorney, for the State

Sentence Affirmed

BY THE DIVISION:

The petitioner was convicted after a jury trial of Felony Murder, Manslaughter 1st Degree with a Firearm, Robbery 1st and Conspiracy to Commit Robbery 1st Degree.

The petitioner was sentenced to an effective sentence of 55 years in prison. The petitioner received a sentence of 45 years for the Felony Murder concurrent sentences for the Manslaughter and Robbery counts. On the Conspiracy to Commit Robbery count the petitioner received a 10 year sentence consecutive to the 45 year sentence for Felony Murder.

The events that underlie these convictions occurred on August 5th, 1991. On that date a food delivery man named Fei Young was robbed by a group of men and shot and killed in the course of that robbery.

Evidence presented at the trial indicated that the petitioner was active in the planning of that robbery, that he assigned various tasks to the other participants in the crime, that he placed the order that lured the deliveryman to his death, that he confronted and robbed the victim and that he picked himself as the gunman in CT Page 12335 the robbery and that he fired the shot that killed the victim after the victim started to holler and run.

The maximum period of incarceration for the Felony Murder could have been 60 years in prison. The 45 years that the petitioner did receive is far short of the maximum. The 10 year sentence that the petitioner received for the Conspiracy to Commit Robbery reflects his leadership role in this case.

One of the legitimate goals of sentencing is the protection of law abiding citizens from those who present a clear and present danger to their safety and well being. The petitioner has shown by his actions that it is not safe to allow him to alive as a free man in society. The 55 year sentence fairly addresses the continuing threat that an individual like Gerrod Ellis presents to the public. The sentence is not inappropriate or disproportionate. The sentence is affirmed.

O'Keefe, J.

Miano, J.

Iannotti, J.

O'Keefe, Miano and Iannotti, J.s, participated in this decision.