Michael A. Hughes v. Dallas County, Dallas County Community College District, Dallas County School Equalization Fund, Dallas Independent School District, and Parkland Hospital District ( 2015 )

I
05-15-00854-CV
'
ORIGINAL
,_,
PAGE I OF 2 PAGES =-
c.n
0
'- -n
nAT T A<: r()J T>JTV D'r H
Case Number: TX-14-41301
"~·"~
~ >o..,
r--
RECEIVED
r-v'_~ IN
):: .. -
5th COURT- OF -
c:;
'""':: APPEALS
-,-
DALLAS,
:f "'<" TEXAS
"-..,
~
:;.,"
~ :_.~-'~
7/22/2015 1:34:54 PM ""':X
I t I
- ,.
r~,~:;::c
\._,;
LISA
;-n .. MATZ
C1 L..:;;:t)f"'l
::t::: ~o
v"s" - Clerk
DALLAS COUMTY, T!:XAfi;'
--<
w
r
-<
With The of Allah, Jehovah, eta!.,
Mel!, stand on our Sovereignty Rights
Allodial Rights, Constitutional Rights
All Unalienable Rights I, reserved!
I, am Sui Juris, Sovereign, Allodialist
Known as Micheal A. Hughes© without doubt
I am Uie Gravamen, Rcrefo Soveretgn - 95th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Affidavit of lndigency
TO HON, KENT SIMS, PRESIDING ADMINITRATOR, JUSTICE, AND/OR JUDGE:
• •uu• ~ • u-.o.
Coming here Sui Juris Sovereign and Allodial pursuant to being Alloium at all times. With respect, I, make
this request as a man, and a mason as I travel through God's green earth. I am seeking this Affidavit of
Indigence under the Rules [TRCP 145, 217; in forcible entry, (i.e. ; eta!.,) J See. Sec. 1.2 {Purpose) .••
l'he :I:exas Cmtstitutien and tbe rules ef pFBEH:!!dure reeegnize that eemrts nmst be open to all pet son with
legitimate disputes, n<>tjust those who oan affurd te pay the rees te get in. Tex. Canst. art.I,See. 13, TRCP
145,217; Griffin Indus., Inc. v. 13th Ct. Appeals, 934 S.W. 2d 349,353 (Tex.l996). TRCP 145 gives
an indigent access to the courthouse without payment of costs. Spellmon v. Sweeney, 819 S.W.2d
206, 208 (Tex. App.- Waco 1991, no writ). TRCP 217 gives an indigent the right to as jury trial without
the payment of the jury fee ...
Truth & Facts:
Who is indigent?
(I.). Justice & Law says: An indigent is a person who has no ability to pay the costs for the suit. TRCP
145. Generally, an individual receiving a governmental entitlement or public assistance may proceed as an
indigent. See id.; Griffin Indus., 934 S.W.2d at 35; Baughman v. Baughman, 65 S.W. 3d 309,315 (Tex.
Xpp. Waco 2001, pe[ DemeilJ •••
Affidavit of Indigency:
(2.). Justice & Law says: An indigence of does not need to comply strictly with the requirements of the
rules of procedure; substantial compliance is sufficient. See: Walker v. Blue Water Garden Apts., 776
S.W.2d 578, 580-581 (Tex. 1989).
"" :
(3.). Justice & Law says: A person who has been living on welfare, has not been regularly employed, and
has not been able to obtain loans to pay for court costs. See: Goffney v. Lowry, 554 S.W.2d 157, 159-60
(Tex. 1977).
(
'
(J.)
PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES
T" "''" o" ~" :
(4.). Justice & Law says: I, do have the right to: The Liberty of "Equal Rights, Equal Protection Rights,
Equal Treatment under the law and/or at law; All of my Rights are reserved See under U.C.C. l-308; and
U.C.C. l-207!!! 1hls is Truth & Facts!
deny
(5.). I am on nub lie assistance:
[a.) ..... On: Welfare;
[b.) ..... On: SSI; See Exhibits attached pages as proof; Exhibits:
[EX: SSI; Ex: l. A. & l. B;
[c.) ..... On: Medicaid;
[d.) ..... On: Emergency Assistance;
[e.) ..... On; Texas Identification Card; Ex: 2. C.;
[() ..... See Physician's Statement for Disabled person Homestead
Exemption. Ex: 3. D. & E.;
[g.) See Exhibits Attached here to.
(6.). No employment because of my impainnents, which is covered by Americans with Disabilities. So, I
don't have any nmney to pay cost of fees of any kind!!!
(7.). I, Sui Juris Sovereign Micheal A. Hughes do have Unalienable Rights, Constitntion Rights and
Common Rights that are Due Process, Substantive Due Process; Indispensable Human Rights based on all
my Godly Rights!!!!!!! Know that my plea is based on my [Rights ... ) I do have the Equal Right have
Access to Court. See: Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 821-28 (1977) ...
Tn,th .& l'oet<-
(8.). II Sui Juris Sovereign Micheal A. Hughes by the law of the land I have Rights that cannot be taken! I
am being denied all of my Rights and being forced under the duress and/or also coercion of error in this
Courtroom. These pleadings must be granted in the behalf of Justice. How ever, if not, it will be a
Fundamental Miscarriage of Justice and a denial of m~ Right to Libecy, Equal Rights, Equal Protection
Rights, Egual Treatment Rights[!] This reserved see below and above and here where the Supreme Court
,
about Equal Protection under Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) eta!., ...
<,
Ri
·~'Jsr' Alli> ....
ts ~.!.c. 1-30~~c 1-207.
'"~ "' M<"'-