prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,386 Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc. A Florida Corporation v. Prevost Car, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation , 67 F.3d 901 ( 1995 )


Menu:
  • 67 F.3d 901

    Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 14,386
    AIRPORT RENT-A-CAR, INC. a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    PREVOST CAR, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

    No. 93-4015.

    United States Court of Appeals,
    Eleventh Circuit.

    Oct. 13, 1995.

    Hugh T. Maloney, Gary S. Maisel, Patterson, Maloney & Gardiner, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for appellant.

    Shirley Jean McEachern, Bard D. Rockenbach, Daniel M. Bachi, Sellars, Supran, Cole, Marion & Espy, P.A., W. Palm Beach, FL, for appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

    Before KRAVITCH, ANDERSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

    PER CURIAM:

    1

    In this case we certified the following questions to the Supreme Court of Florida:

    2

    (1) WHETHER, UNDER FLORIDA LAW, THE ECONOMIC LOSS RULE APPLIES TO NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT WHERE THE ONLY DAMAGES CLAIMED ARE TO THE PRODUCT ITSELF AND WHERE THE PLAINTIFF CLAIMS TO HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE THEORY OF RECOVERY.

    3

    (2) WHETHER, UNDER FLORIDA LAW, A CAUSE OF ACTION OTHERWISE PRECLUDED BY THE ECONOMIC LOSS RULE MAY BE MAINTAINED IF THE DAMAGE TO THE PRODUCT IS CAUSED BY A SUDDEN CALAMITOUS EVENT.

    4

    (3) WHETHER, UNDER FLORIDA LAW, A CAUSE OF ACTION MAY EXIST OUTSIDE THE BAR OF THE ECONOMIC LOSS RULE WHERE THE PLAINTIFFS ALLEGE A DUTY TO WARN WHICH AROSE FROM FACTS WHICH CAME TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE COMPANY AFTER THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS AND AFTER THE CONTRACT.

    5

    Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Prevost Car, Inc., 18 F.3d 1555, 1559 (11th Cir.1994).

    6

    The Florida Supreme Court has answered the first question in the affirmative, and the second and third questions in the negative. Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Prevost Car, Inc., 660 So.2d 628 (Fla.1995). Based upon these answers, we conclude that Airport Rent-A-Car's tort claims against Prevost, arising from the destruction of two passenger buses owned by Airport Rent-A-Car and manufactured by Prevost, are barred by Florida's Economic Loss Rule. We therefore affirm the district court's dismissal of Airport Rent-A-Car's claims.

    7

    AFFIRMED.

Document Info

Docket Number: 93-4015

Citation Numbers: 67 F.3d 901

Judges: Anderson, Edmondson, Kravitch, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 10/13/1995

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023