Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Betty Rogers , 646 F. App'x 890 ( 2016 )

Case: 15-12675 Date Filed: 04/01/2016 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-12675
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cv-01983-GAP-TBS
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY,
a North Carolina banking corporation, successor in interest to Colonial Bank
by asset acquisition from the FDIC as receiver for Colonial Bank,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendant,
BETTY ROGERS,
an individual,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 1, 2016)
Case: 15-12675 Date Filed: 04/01/2016 Page: 2 of 2
Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Betty Rogers appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to add an
affirmative defense and grant of Branch Banking and Trust Company’s motion for
summary judgment. We need not consider these challenges, however, as this
Court dismissed them for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We also limited
review on appeal to the deficiency judgment entered against Rogers on June 5,
2015. Rogers fails to discuss the deficiency judgment in either her opening or
reply brief, and thus she has waived any arguments pertaining to it. See Hamilton
v. Southland Christian Sch., Inc., 680 F.3d 1316, 1318 (11th Cir. 2012) (discussing
the well-settled principle that a party abandons an issue “by failing to list or
otherwise state it as an issue on appeal”). Accordingly, we affirm the deficiency
judgment.
AFFIRMED.
2