United States v. Freddy Paul Foreman, Jr. ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • USCA11 Case: 21-12778      Date Filed: 04/26/2022   Page: 1 of 2
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    In the
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eleventh Circuit
    ____________________
    No. 21-12778
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ____________________
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    FREDDY PAUL FOREMAN, JR.,
    a.k.a. Buckshot,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ____________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Alabama
    D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00006-CG-B-1
    ____________________
    USCA11 Case: 21-12778        Date Filed: 04/26/2022    Page: 2 of 2
    2                      Opinion of the Court               21-12778
    Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Thomas B. Walsh, appointed counsel for Freddy Foreman,
    Jr., in his appeal of the revocation of his supervised release, has
    moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
    and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
    counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
    Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
    arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
    GRANTED, and Foreman’s revocation of supervised release and
    sentence are AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-12778

Filed Date: 4/26/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/26/2022