State v. Crockett ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                      NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
    UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
    AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
    IN THE
    ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
    DIVISION ONE
    STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,
    v.
    CHARLES TAYLOR CROCKETT, Petitioner.
    No. 1 CA-CR 21-0341 PRPC
    FILED 1-13-2022
    Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
    No. CR2011-006752-003
    The Honorable Ronee Korbin Steiner, Judge
    REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED
    COUNSEL
    Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix
    By Amanda M. Parker
    Counsel for Respondent
    The Law Office of Stephen L. Crawford, P.L.L.C., Phoenix
    By Stephen L. Crawford
    Counsel for Petitioner
    STATE v. CROCKETT
    Decision of the Court
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Presiding Judge D. Steven Williams, Judge David B. Gass, and Judge James
    B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court.
    PER CURIUM:
    ¶1             Petitioner Charles Taylor Crockett seeks review of the
    superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is
    petitioner’s latest successive petition.
    ¶2             Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will
    not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.
    State v. Gutierrez, 
    229 Ariz. 573
    , 577, ¶ 19, 
    278 P.3d 1276
    , 1280 (2012). It is
    petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by
    denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 
    227 Ariz. 537
    , ¶ 1, 
    260 P.3d 1102
    , 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of
    establishing abuse of discretion on review).
    ¶3            We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
    court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition
    for review. The petitioner has failed to show an abuse of discretion.
    ¶4            For the foregoing reasons, this court grants review but denies
    relief.
    AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court
    FILED: AA
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1 CA-CR 21-0341-PRPC

Filed Date: 1/13/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2022