Ford v. State , 376 S.W.3d 706 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Melvin Ford, also known as James Spann (“Ford”), appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Ford’s request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

    An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. ED 97301

Citation Numbers: 376 S.W.3d 706

Judges: Gaertner, Hoff, III

Filed Date: 9/4/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/2/2021