Nash, Patrick Eugene ( 2022 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-94,173-01
EX PARTE PATRICK EUGENE NASH, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. B20199-1604-W1 IN THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT
FROM HALE COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of sexual performance of a child and sentenced to thirty years’
imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Nash v. State, No. 07-19-
00298-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo May 27, 2020) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed
this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to tender as an exhibit or
otherwise make the search warrant a part of the trial record. Applicant also contends that appellate
counsel was ineffective for failing to supplement the record with the search warrant, which prevented
him from presenting a record sufficient to support the suppression claim raised on appeal. Applicant
2
has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668(1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for
findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order both trial
counsel and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial
court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). It appears that Applicant is represented by
counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine if Applicant is represented by
counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be
represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing.
See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make findings
of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate counsel’s performance was deficient and
Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall make specific findings as to trial counsel’s and
appellate counsel’s reasons for not making the search warrant part of the trial and/or appellate record.
The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response
to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: October 12, 2022
Do not publish