Barrette v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-1046V
    UNPUBLISHED
    JODIE BARRETTE,                                             Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                            Filed: November 29, 2021
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                            Administration (SIRVA)
    Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
    Mollie Danielle Gorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On August 20, 2020, Jodie Barrette filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of influenza (“flu”) and Pneumococcal 23 (“PCV 23”)
    vaccines that were administered to her on November 8, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was
    assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On October 29, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled
    to compensation for SIRVA. On November 29, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on award
    of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $95,823.49
    (comprised of $95,000.00 in pain and suffering and $823.49 in past unreimbursable
    expenses). Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees
    1  Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is
    entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $95,823.49 (comprised of $95,000.00 in pain and suffering and
    $823.49 in past unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to
    Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available
    under Section 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    )
    JODIE BARRETTE,                                  )
    )
    Petitioner,                        )
    )    No. 20-1046V
    v.                                               )    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )    ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN                    )
    SERVICES,                                        )
    )
    Respondent.                        )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On August 20, 2020, Jodie Barrette (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under
    the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”
    or “Act”), alleging that she suffered from a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration
    (“SIRVA”), defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of influenza (“flu”)
    and Pneumococcal 23 vaccines that she received on November 8, 2018. 1 Petition at 1. On
    October 27, 2021, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c)
    Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a
    SIRVA Table injury following a flu vaccination. ECF No. 23. On October 29, 2021, the Chief
    Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF
    No. 24.
    1
    The Pneumococcal 23 vaccine is not a vaccine covered under the Act. The compensation to
    petitioner is based on the presumed Table injury from the flu vaccine only.
    Items of Compensation
    A.      Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $95,000.00 in pain and suffering.
    See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
    B.      Past Unreimbursable Expenses
    Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable
    expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
    awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $823.49. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
    15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees.
    These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled
    under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
    lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and
    the Court’s judgment award the following 2: a lump sum payment of $95,823.49, in the form of a
    check payable to petitioner.
    III.   Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
    Lump sum payable to petitioner, Jodie Barrette:                              $95,823.49
    2
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings
    and future pain and suffering.
    2
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    TRACI R. PATTON
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ Mollie D. Gorney
    MOLLIE D. GORNEY
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 616-4029
    DATED: November 29, 2021
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1046

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 1/6/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/6/2022