State v. Massey ( 2012 )

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 vs. NO. 31,679 5 DAVID MASSEY, 6 Defendant-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF ROOSEVELT COUNTY 8 Teddy L. Hartley, District Judge 9 Gary K. King, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Appellee 12 Daniel R. Lindsey, P.C. 13 Daniel R. Lindsey 14 John L. Collins 15 Clovis, NM 16 for Appellant 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 GARCIA, Judge. 3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of 4 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 5 and the time for doing so has expired. 6 Affirmed. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 10 WE CONCUR: 11 12 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 13 14 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 2