Ricardo v. Wells Fargo ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •        Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed June 24, 2015.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D14-3056
    Lower Tribunal No. 08-1317
    ________________
    Roman Ricardo,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    Wells Fargo Bank National Association, etc.,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
    County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge.
    Scott S. Levine (Weston), for appellant.
    Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, and Diana B.
    Matson (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
    Before LAGOA, SALTER, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
    PER CURIAM.
    Appellant, Roman Ricardo (“Ricardo”), appeals the trial court’s order
    denying rehearing of an order denying Ricardo’s motion to vacate a final judgment
    filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) in a foreclosure case.
    The Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal. Because an order on a motion for
    rehearing is not independently appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 9.130(a)(4), we grant Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of
    jurisdiction. See Christ v. Christ, 
    103 So. 3d 1056
    , 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
    (“[T]he order denying rehearing is not independently reviewable.”) (citing Fla. R.
    App. P. 9.130(a)(4), and Grant v. Jones, 
    933 So. 2d 32
    (Fla. 1st DCA 2006));
    accord Bastida v. Vitaver, 
    590 So. 2d 1092
    , 1092-93 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
    (dismissing appeal of order denying rehearing because it was “plainly a non-final
    order which is not appealable under Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a), as authorized by
    Article V, Section 4(b)(1) of the Florida Constitution.”).
    Dismissed.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-3056

Filed Date: 6/24/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/24/2015