Nancy Groves v. Westbank Homeowners Association, Inc. ( 2002 )


Menu:
















  • In The

    Court of Appeals

    Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



    ______________________________


    No. 06-02-00108-CV

    ______________________________




    NANCY GROVES, Appellant


    V.


    WESTBANK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ACMP, INC., BUTLER
    & HAILEY, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, AND ROY D. HAILEY, Appellees




    On Appeal from the Number Three County Court at Law

    Harris County, Texas

    Trial Court No. 739551









    Before Morriss, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ.

    Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss


    O P I N I O N


    Nancy Groves, appellant, has filed a motion asking this Court to dismiss her appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1, her motion is granted.

    The appeal is dismissed.



    Josh R. Morriss, III

    Chief Justice



    Date Submitted: August 14, 2002

    Date Decided: August 15, 2002



    Do Not Publish

    n style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif">                                              


    On Appeal from the 71st Judicial District Court

    Harrison County, Texas

    Trial Court No. 02-1036



                                                     




    Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

    Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss



    MEMORANDUM OPINION

                This Court has been notified that a petition for bankruptcy concerning appellee Charles Bishop has been filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, under cause number 05-44129. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C.A. § 362 (West 2004), further action in this cause is automatically stayed.

                Accordingly, for administrative purposes, this case is abated and will be treated as closed. Any party may reinstate by promptly filing a motion with an attached certified copy of the order showing that the automatic bankruptcy stay has been lifted or terminated and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this Court. In the event of reinstatement, any period that began to run and had not expired at the time of suspension will begin anew when the proceeding is reinstated.

     

     

                                                                                        Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                        Chief Justice  


    Date Submitted:          September 27, 2005

    Date Decided:             September 28, 2005


Document Info

Docket Number: 06-02-00108-CV

Filed Date: 8/15/2002

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015