Judi Lynn Ledford v. State ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                                              NO. 07-02-0340-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL E
    SEPTEMBER 26, 2002
    ______________________________
    JUDI LYNN LEDFORD,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
    NO. 45,613-A; HON. RICHARD DAMBOLD, PRESIDING
    _______________________________
    Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, SJ.1
    Judi Lynn Ledford appealed, pro se, her conviction for possession of a controlled
    substance. However, subsequent thereto, and within the time allotted for doing so,
    appellant also moved for a new trial through her attorney. Within 75 days of the day
    sentence was imposed, the trial court granted the motion. This resulted in the case being
    restored to its position before trial, TEX . R. APP. P. 21.9, and, we have no jurisdiction over
    the appeal. Waller v. State, 
    931 S.W.2d 640
    , 643-44 (Tex. App.–Dallas 1996, no writ).
    1
    John T. B oyd, C hief Justice (R et.), Se venth Court of Appea ls, sitting by assignm ent. T E X . G O V ’T
    C ODE A N N . §75 .002 (a)(1 ) (Vernon Sup p. 2002).
    The State also moved to dismiss in the trial court on the basis the case had been re-filed
    under a different cause number. That motion was granted by the trial court on September
    13, 2002.
    Consequently, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
    Per Curiam
    Do not publish.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-02-00340-CR

Filed Date: 9/26/2002

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/7/2015