Moniz v. Watanabe ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                         Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-16-0000687
    29-DEC-2016
    03:10 PM
    SCPW-16-0000687
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    STACY MONIZ, TRUSTEE OF THE UNRECORDED STACY MONIZ REVOCABLE
    TRUST DATED JANUARY 22, 2013; JO ANNE N. MONIZ, TRUSTEE OF THE
    UNRECORDED JO ANNE N. MONIZ TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 12, 1999;
    ANTONIA L. MONIZ; and JOHN MONIZ, Petitioners,
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE KATHLEEN N.A. WATANABE, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT
    COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent Judge,
    and
    COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LIMITED, a Hawai#i corporation; SANDY
    POEHNELT; PUA#A #ILI #OI #OI OHANA LLC, a Hawai#i limited liability
    company; and THE RIGHT SLICE LLC, a Hawai#i limited liability
    company; MARY C. WALSH, AS TRUSTEE OF TRUST A, A SUB-TRUST OF THE
    BEATRICE DUARTE LIVING TRUST CREATED UNDER AN UNRECORDED TRUST
    AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 24, 1991, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED IN AN
    UNRECORDED DOCUMENT DATED JULY 14, 2008, AND AS TRUSTEE DATED
    JANUARY 16, 2002, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED THE 28TH DAY OF JULY,
    2008, AS IT MAY BE FURTHER AMENDED, Respondents.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (CIV. NO. 15-1-0087)
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of petitioners’ petition for writ of
    mandamus, filed on October 17, 2016, the documents attached
    thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it
    appears that petitioners are currently seeking relief in the
    Intermediate Court of Appeals in CAAP-16-0000820.     Petitioners,
    therefore, fail to demonstrate that they are entitled to the
    requested writ of mandamus.   See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200,
    204-05, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an
    extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner
    demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack
    of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or
    obtain the requested action).   Accordingly,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of
    mandamus is denied.
    DATED:   Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 29, 2016.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Richard W. Pollack
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-16-0000687

Filed Date: 12/29/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/30/2016