Bonny Berkner v. Penny Pritzker , 561 F. App'x 279 ( 2014 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1600
BONNY BERKNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PENNY PRITZKER, In her official capacity as Secretary, U.S.
Department of Commerce,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:12-cv-01390-DKC)
Submitted: January 30, 2014 Decided: March 25, 2014
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary M. Gilbert, Ari M. Wilkenfeld, THE LAW OFFICES OF GARY M.
GILBERT AND ASSOCIATES PC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for
Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Joseph R.
Baldwin, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bonny M. Berkner brought this action against the
Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, alleging
that she was subjected to unlawful harassment, refused
reasonable accommodation, discriminated against on the basis of
her disabilities, and retaliated against, in violation of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 701 et
seq.; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.
§ 12101 et seq.; and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.. We have reviewed the
record and have considered the parties’ arguments and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Berkner v. Blank, No. 8:12-cv-01390-DKC
(D. Md. Mar. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2