GM Corp Chevrolet v. New A.C. Chevrolet ( 2001 )

Opinions of the United 2001 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-12-2001 GM Corp Chevrolet v. New A.C. Chevrolet Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 00-5251 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001 Recommended Citation "GM Corp Chevrolet v. New A.C. Chevrolet" (2001). 2001 Decisions. Paper 289. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001/289 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2001 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 00-5251 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION CHEVROLET MOTOR DIVISION v. THE NEW A.C. CHEVROLET, INC. dba THE NEW A.C. CHEVROLET, Appellant (D.C. Civil No. 98-cv-00112) Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, RENDELL and MAGILL, Circuit Judges. ______________________ ORDER AMENDING OPINION _______________________ The slip opinion filed on August 27, 2001 in the above case is hereby amended as follows: 1. In the first footnote signaled by an asterisk, the correct initial for Judge Magill should be J. 2. On page 3, line 12, the word "as" should be added after the word "well." 3. On page 17, second paragraph of footnote 3, line 4, the word "finality" should be replaced with "final." 4. On page 21, first full paragraph, second line from the bottom, add the word "the" before the word "premises." 5. On page 26, line 2, add commas after the words "provisions" and "general." 6. On page 27, in footnote 8, paragraph 2, third line from the bottom, the line should read: contractual agreements as well" . . . "has been carried into the franchise. 7. On page 45, Section 2, first paragraph, line 1, add the word "the" before "legal framework." BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward R. Becker Chief Judge DATED: December 12, 2001