Christy v. PA Turnpike Comm ( 1995 )

Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-27-1995 Christy v PA Turnpike Comm Precedential or Non-Precedential: Docket 94-1386 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995 Recommended Citation "Christy v PA Turnpike Comm" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 84. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/84 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ Nos. 94-1386 and 94-1398 ___________ CHARLES A. CHRISTY, vs. PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION, A DULY ORGANIZED AND EXISTING AGENCY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; ROBERT BRADY, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JAMES J. DODARO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; HOWARD YERUSALIM, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; FRANK S. URSOMARSO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JAMES F. MALONE, III, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOHN L. SOKOL, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; S. MICHAEL PALERMO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOSEPH L. DIRIENZO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; SAMUEL S. CARNABUCI, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; MELVIN M. SHELTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; DEBORAH KOVAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOHN A. BOSCHI, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; VINCENT J. GRECO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; JOHN A. STEWART, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; GEORGE PILECKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; SEAN PILECKI, INDIVIDUALLY Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Robert Brady, Vincent Greco and John Stewart Appellants No. 94-1386 John A. Boschi, Appellant No. 94-1398 ___________ BEFORE: STAPLETON, ALITO and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. ___________ ORDER ___________ IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The petition for panel rehearing is granted. 2. The panel's opinion filed March 27, l995 is vacated. 3. A revised panel opinion will be filed following circulation to the full court in accordance with I.O.P. 9.4. 4. The application for rehearing in banc is dismissed as moot, but without prejudice to the filing of a new application for rehearing in banc in accordance with I.O.P. 9.5. BY THE COURT /s/ Timothy K. Lewis Circuit Judge Dated: April 27, l995