Quitman Robinson v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operat ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •          UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
    No. 17-3397
    QUITMAN ROBINSON
    v.
    NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.;
    JANE DOE 1-100
    New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.,
    Appellant
    (D.N.J. No. 2-14-cv-02679)
    Present: McKEE, RESTREPO, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
    ORDER GRANTING PANEL REHEARING SUA SPONTE
    AND JUDGMENT ORDER
    On January 29, 2019, a panel of this Court (“Panel”) issued a decision (“Decision”)
    reversing the district court’s order of October 19, 2017, that had denied a motion by New
    Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (“NJ Transit”) to vacate a judgement entered in favor
    of Quitman Robinson (“Robinson”) in the amount of $824,152.59. The Panel held that NJ
    Transit had sovereign immunity from plaintiff’s claims that had been brought under the
    Federal Employers Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq. (“FELA”). Robinson filed a
    petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc. On March 12, 2019, NJ Transit filed a
    motion to hold the case is abeyance while the parties discussed a global settlement. By
    order entered March 15, 2019, the case was held in abeyance.
    On June 26, 2019, New Jersey P.L.2019, c. 137 was enacted (“Act”), which
    provides that NJ Transit may not assert sovereign immunity as a defense to claims arising
    under certain federal statutes, including FELA. The Act was effective immediately and, by
    its terms, applies to actions against NJ Transit pending in any court of appeals, which
    would include this matter. In light of the passage of the Act, NJ Transit no longer
    possesses sovereign immunity from the claims Robinson has asserted against NJ Transit.
    Accordingly, it is hereby O R D E R E D that panel rehearing in this matter is granted sua
    sponte. The prior opinion and judgment are hereby VACATED. In light of the action by
    the panel appellee’s petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc is dismissed as moot.
    It is further O R D E R E D that the judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of
    $824,152.59 is affirmed by this Court, and the matter is remanded to the district court.
    By the Court,
    s/ L. Felipe Restrepo
    Circuit Judge
    Dated: August 29, 2019
    cc: All Counsel of Record
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-3397

Filed Date: 8/29/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/29/2019