State v. Dunn , 901 S.W.2d 352 ( 1995 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Defendant appeals the judgment following his conviction by a jury of assault in the third degree, § 565.070 RSMo 1994, for which he was fined $500. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 67118

Citation Numbers: 901 S.W.2d 352

Judges: Crahan, Gaertner, Reinhard

Filed Date: 6/30/1995

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/1/2021