WILLIAM P. RAGUSA v. VICTORIA M. RAGUSA ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •        DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FOURTH DISTRICT
    WILLIAM P. RAGUSA,
    Appellant,
    v.
    VICTORIA M. RAGUSA,
    Appellee.
    No. 4D21-689
    [November 24, 2021]
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
    Beach County; Karen M. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2018-DR-008641-
    XXXX-NB.
    William P. Ragusa, Boynton Beach, pro se.
    No appearance for appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 
    377 So. 2d 1150
    , 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that “[w]ithout a record of the trial
    proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying
    factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not
    supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory,” and “[w]ithout
    knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably
    conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require
    reversal”); Esaw v. Esaw, 
    965 So. 2d 1261
    , 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“The
    most salient impediment to meaningful review of the trial court’s decision
    is not the absence of findings, but the absence of a transcript.”).
    GROSS, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
    *          *          *
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-0689

Filed Date: 11/24/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/24/2021