Omar McBride v. ( 2022 )

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 22-2226
___________
IN RE: OMAR McBRIDE,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(Related to Crim. No. 92-cr-00671-10)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
September 22, 2022
Before: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, PORTER and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: October 4, 2022)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
Petitioner Omar McBride filed a pro se “Petition for Judicial Review Pursuant to
Mediation Rule L.A.R. 33.1 Appellate Mediation Program,” which we have construed as
a mandamus petition requesting that we direct the District Court to rule on his pending
*
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.
motion for a sentence reduction. By order entered September 19, 2022, the District Court
denied the motion.
In light of the District Court’s action, McBride’s mandamus petition no longer
presents a live controversy. Therefore, we will dismiss it as moot. See Blanciak v.
Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur
during the course of adjudication that . . . prevent a court from being able to grant the
requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”).
2