Nazario Burgos v. Mary Canino ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                                            Opinions of the United
    2009 Decisions                                                                                                             States Court of Appeals
    for the Third Circuit
    6-16-2009
    Nazario Burgos v. Mary Canino
    Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
    Docket No. 09-1043
    Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009
    Recommended Citation
    "Nazario Burgos v. Mary Canino" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1178.
    http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1178
    This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
    University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
    University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
    _____________
    No. 09-1043
    _____________
    NAZARIO BURGOS,
    Appellant
    v.
    MARY CANINO; MARSHALL, CORRECTION OFFICER;
    DAY, LIEUTENANT; LEVI HOSBAND; TONY WOLFE; CUDDEBACK, CORRECTION
    OFFICER; DAVID DIGUGLIELMO; CORRETTE, CORRECTION OFFICER; LIEUTENANT
    DOYLE; LIEUTENANT SMITH; CORRECTION OFFICER CHO; CORRECTION OFFICER
    BARRATA; SCOTT DAVIES
    ____________________________________
    On Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    (D.C. Civil No. 2-06-cv-02497)
    District Judge: Honorable Anita B. Brody
    ____________________________________
    Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
    or Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6
    June 4, 2009
    Before: SLOVITER, FUENTES AND JORDAN, Circuit Judges
    ORDER AMENDING OPINION
    The opinion issued by this Court on June 15, 2009 has been amended. On page two,
    paragraph two the “period” after the word “Pennsylvania” is now a comma and the word
    “Burgus” has been removed after the period.
    At the direction of the Court, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the Clerk shall file an
    amended opinion.
    For the Court,
    Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
    Dated: June 16, 2009
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-1043

Filed Date: 6/16/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021