-
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-2652 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Antonio Triplett, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: June 8, 2007 Filed: July 23, 2007 ___________ Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Antonio Triplett appeals the district court’s1 order denying his motion for return of seized property under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g). Because Triplett’s property was seized in September 2000, his action was subject to the provisions of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA), Pub. L. No. 106-185,
114 Stat. 202, codified in part at
18 U.S.C. § 983, which applies to forfeiture actions initiated after August 23, 2000. See Mesa Valderrama v. United States,
417 F.3d 1189, 1195 (11th Cir. 2005). Under CAFRA, a person who does not receive 1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. notice in a nonjudicial civil forfeiture may move to set aside the forfeiture, but such motion must be filed within 5 years after the date of final publication of the seizure notice, and is the exclusive remedy to set aside a declaration of forfeiture. See
18 U.S.C. § 983(e). Triplett’s action, filed more than 5 years after the date of final publication in the Wall Street Journal on November 20, 2000, is time-barred. See
18 U.S.C. § 983(e)(3). Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________ -2-
Document Info
Docket Number: 06-2652
Citation Numbers: 240 F. App'x 736
Filed Date: 7/23/2007
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023