United States v. Fuente-Aguilera , 203 F. App'x 671 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                        United States Court of Appeals
    Fifth Circuit
    F I L E D
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   October 25, 2006
    Charles R. Fulbruge III
    Clerk
    No. 05-41542
    Conference Calendar
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JOSE MARCO ANTONIO FUENTE-AGUILERA,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    --------------------
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Texas
    USDC No. 5:05-CR-906-ALL
    --------------------
    Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:*
    Jose Marco Antonio Fuente-Aguilera appeals his guilty-plea
    conviction of, and sentence for, violating 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
     by
    being found in the United States without permission after
    deportation.   He argues, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
    530 U.S. 466
     (2000), that the 40-month term of imprisonment imposed
    in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for
    the offense charged in his indictment.    He challenges the
    constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and
    *
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
    this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
    under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    No. 05-41542
    -2-
    aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than
    elements of the offense that must be found by a jury.
    Fuente-Aguilera’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by
    Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
    523 U.S. 224
    , 235 (1998).
    Although Fuente-Aguilera contends that Almendarez-Torres was
    incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court
    would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have
    repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that
    Almendarez-Torres remains binding.   See United States v.
    Garza-Lopez, 
    410 F.3d 268
    , 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    126 S. Ct. 298
     (2005).   Fuente-Aguilera properly concedes that his
    argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit
    precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further
    review.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-41542

Citation Numbers: 203 F. App'x 671

Judges: DeMOSS, Jolly, Per Curiam, Stewart

Filed Date: 10/25/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/2/2023