Hardman v. State , 137 Ga. 165 ( 1911 )


Menu:
  • Eish, 0. 3.

    Counsel for tlie plaintiff in error says in Iris brief filed in this court that the only point insisted on for a reversal of the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is that the verdict is without evidence to support it. After a careful study of the evidence, we are of the opinion that it was sufficient to support the verdict.

    Judgment affirmed.

    All the Justices concur.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 137 Ga. 165

Judges: Eish

Filed Date: 12/12/1911

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023