Rongqi Jia v. Merrick Garland ( 2021 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1857
RONGQI JIA; CAIXIA LI,
Petitioners,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: May 19, 2021 Decided: June 1, 2021
Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Meer M.M. Rahman, East Brunswick, New Jersey, for Petitioners. Jeffrey Bossert Clark,
Assistant Attorney General, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Tim Ramnitz, Office of
Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rongqi Jia and his wife, Caixia Li, natives and citizens of the People’s Republic of
China, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying their motion to
reopen and rescind their in absentia removal orders. We have reviewed the administrative
record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)
(2021). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See
In re Jia (B.I.A. July 10, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2