United States v. Christopher Reina ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 20-4602
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER REINA,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
    Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:14-cr-00252-WO-1)
    Submitted: May 27, 2021                                           Decided: June 11, 2021
    Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Harvey A. Carpenter IV, THE LAW OFFICES OF HA (ALEC) CARPENTER IV,
    Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Kyle David Pousson, Assistant United States
    Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    The district court revoked Christopher Alexander Reina’s term of supervised release
    based on his drug use and his commission of new criminal conduct and sentenced him to
    20 months’ imprisonment, which is to run consecutively to any sentence imposed for his
    North Carolina conviction for felony breaking and entering. The district court allowed him
    to self-report by December 28, 2020, for service of his sentence. Reina failed to report and
    his whereabouts are unknown. * Reina’s counsel has filed an appellate brief pursuant to
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967). The Government has moved to dismiss the
    appeal based on Reina’s status as a fugitive.
    “It has been settled for well over a century that an appellate court may dismiss the
    appeal of a defendant who is a fugitive from justice during the pendency of his appeal.”
    Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States, 
    507 U.S. 234
    , 239 (1993). Reina’s fugitive status
    “disentitles [him] to call upon the resources of the Court for determination of his claims.”
    
    Id. at 240
     (quoting Molinaro v. New Jersey, 
    396 U.S. 365
    , 366 (1970)).
    Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    *
    Reina also failed to self-surrender to North Carolina authorities for service of his
    state sentence imposed for his breaking and entering conviction.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-4602

Filed Date: 6/11/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/11/2021