Infante v. Curley , 746 N.Y.2d 617 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  • The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion by, in effect, denying the appellants’ motion to vacate the order dated August 20, 2002. The appellants failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their default or a meritorious claim (see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138).

    The appellants’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see Matter of Boy-land v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 122 AD2d 902, 903). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, McGinity, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 297 A.D.2d 396, 746 N.Y.2d 617

Filed Date: 8/28/2002

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2022