Joseph Schafer v. Citibank, N.A. , 447 F. App'x 466 ( 2011 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2043
JOSEPH SCHAFER; MAUREEN SCHAFER,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
CITIBANK, N.A., as trustee for Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust
2006-5; BEAR STEARNS ALT-A TRUST 2006-5, A New York common
law trust; JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., f/k/a EMC Mortgage
Corporation, as successor in interest to EMC Mortgage, LLC;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, a
Delaware Corporation; COMMONWEALTH TRUSTEES, LLC,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
FIRST GUARANTY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a Virginia Corporation;
DAVID A. NEAL, a Virginia Resident, Original Trustee,
Defendants.
--------------------------------------
VIRGINIA POVERTY LAW CENTER; NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER;
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONSUMER ADVOCATES; HOUSING
OPPORTUNITIES MADE EQUAL; VIRGINIA INTERFAITH CENTER FOR
PUBLIC POLICY,
Amici Supporting Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00010-GBL-TCB)
Submitted: September 19, 2011 Decided: September 28, 2011
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher E. Brown, R. Michael Smith, BROWN, BROWN & BROWN,
P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellants. Eric N. Heyer,
THOMPSON & HINE LLP, Washington, D.C.; Mark D. Meyer, ROSENBERG
& ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees. Thomas D.
Domonoske, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, Harrisonburg, Virginia;
Brenda Castaneda, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, Charlottesville,
Virginia, for Amici Supporting Appellants.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph and Maureen Schafer appeal the district court’s
order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to
dismiss Plaintiffs’ state law claims for declaratory judgment,
breach of fiduciary duty, and quiet title, as well as their
claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.A.
§§ 1692-1692p (West 2009 & Supp. 2011). Potential amici curiae
have filed a motion to file an amici curiae brief, along with an
amici curiae brief, and a motion to certify a question to the
Supreme Court of Virginia. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant the motion
to file the amici curiae brief, we deny the motion to certify a
question to the Supreme Court of Virginia and affirm the
district court’s order. See Schafer v. Citibank, N.A., No.
1:10-cv-00010-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. Aug. 3, 2010); see also
Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., N.A., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir. 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3