Pennington v. Taylor ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6443
CURTIS PENNINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
L. TAYLOR, Correctional Officer, POD Officer,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MECKLENBURG CORRECTIONAL CENTER; VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-02-604-2)
Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 4, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Pennington, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Pennington appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pennington v.
Taylor, No. CA-02-604-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -