Randolph v. Felts , 203 F. App'x 478 ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7466
JACK DEWHAN RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES T. FELTS, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston,
District Judge. (5:05-cv-00805)
Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 24, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jack Dewhan Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jack Dewhan Randolph appeals the district court’s
judgment order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Randolph v.
Felts, No. 5:05-cv-00805 (S.D.W. Va. July 21, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED
*
To the extent Randolph may be seeking authorization under 28
U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2000) motion, we deny authorization.
- 2 -