United States v. Williams , 100 F. App'x 211 ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7504
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GLENN LEE WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CR-95-136-F; CA-98-513-5-F)
Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 16, 2004
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glenn Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Glenn Williams appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion to amend his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2000). Williams also asserts that in the order denying his
motion to amend the district court improperly permitted the
Government to file a motion for summary judgment in his habeas
litigation. The district court has since granted summary judgment
in favor of the Government and dismissed his motion.
We have reviewed the record and conclude that Williams
has not made “a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000); see
Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.
2001).
We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid in the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -