Kessler v. Deeds ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 95-7664
    FRANK E. KESSLER, JR.,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    GEORGE DEEDS, Warden, Keen Mountain Correc-
    tional Center,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
    trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-95-89-R)
    Submitted:   April 15, 1996                 Decided:   April 25, 1996
    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Frank E. Kessler, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,
    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (1988) petition. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom-
    mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and
    dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district
    court. Kessler v. Deeds, No. CA-95-89-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 19, 1995).
    We note that Appellant may have suggested in his state habeas
    petition that his procedural default was due to attorney error.
    However, we conclude that Appellant failed to bear his burden of
    proving prejudice as a result of that error either in the state
    court or in district court. See Murray v. Carrier, 
    477 U.S. 478
    (1986); United States v. Frady, 
    456 U.S. 152
     (1982). Consequently,
    his procedural default is not excused. We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-7664

Filed Date: 4/25/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021