Beach v. Wake County School System ( 1999 )


Menu:
  • UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    ROGER A. BEACH,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    No. 99-1079
    WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL
    SYSTEM,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge.
    (CA-98-621-5-BO2)
    Submitted: March 23, 1999
    Decided: April 9, 1999
    Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and
    BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    _________________________________________________________________
    COUNSEL
    Roger A. Beach, Appellant Pro Se.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
    Local Rule 36(c).
    _________________________________________________________________
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:
    Roger A. Beach appeals from the dismissal of his Age Discrimina-
    tion in Employment action. The district court dismissed the action as
    frivolous upon a conclusion that it had been untimely filed. In his
    complaint, Beach alleged a continuing violation of the ADEA starting
    from August 11, 1989, but did not include either proof of the charge
    he filed with the EEOC or the right to sue letter he had received from
    the EEOC. Included with his informal brief filed in this court, how-
    ever, was his right to sue letter. Review of this letter reveals that
    Beach filed his complaint in the district court within the ninety day
    period set forth therein. Because Beach should have been allowed to
    particularize his complaint to include his right to sue letter, we vacate
    the district court's order and remand this action to the district court.*
    See Johnson v. Silvers, 
    742 F.2d 823
    , 825 n.2 (4th Cir. 1984). We dis-
    pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.
    VACATED AND REMANDED
    _________________________________________________________________
    *By this disposition, we indicate no opinion regarding either the merits
    of Beach's claims or any defenses thereto or whether he properly
    exhausted his administrative remedies.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-1079

Filed Date: 4/9/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021