Glazebrook v. Booker ( 1997 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6791
WILLIAM H. GLAZEBROOK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MALCOLM A. BOOKER, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
RENO S. HARP; PAUL F. SHERIDAN; THEODORE J.
CRADDOCK; JUDGE FRED COMBS; PHYLLIS E.
GALLANTI; ROBERT J. GREY, JR.; JANES H.
FLIPPEN, JR.; JUDGE SNODDY; JUDGE SPAIN; JUDGE
BLANTON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-95-711-R)
Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 9, 1997
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William H. Glazebrook, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Perry, Jr.,
PERRY & WINDELS, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-
firm on the reasoning of the district court. Glazebrook v. Booker,
No. CA-95-711-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 17, 1996; Apr. 26, 1996). We deny
Appellant's motion for expedited treatment, motion for injunction,
motion for permission to add newly emerging evidence, and two mo-
tions for emergency relief. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2