Clarence Dukes v. Richard Wilson ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6910
CLARENCE DUKES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD WILSON, Business Manager,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior
District Judge. (7:11-cv-00530-NKM-RSB)
Submitted: October 28, 2013 Decided: November 5, 2013
Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Dukes, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs Todd, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Dukes appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Dukes v. Wilson, No. 7:11-cv-00530-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va.
August 28, 2012; May 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2