Akins v. United States ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-6979
    JERNARD AKINS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF
    JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; HARRY G.
    LAPPIN, Director; ASSOCIATE WARDEN OF EVANS
    CORRECTIONAL   INSTITUTION;   TYRONE  ALLEN,
    Associate Warden; ROBERT MCLAFFERTY, Special
    Agent; STEVEN PRICE, Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
    (3:04-cv-23200-MBS)
    Submitted: September 26, 2006              Decided: October 2, 2006
    Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jernard Akins, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    - 2 -
    PER CURIAM:
    Jernard   Akins    appeals      the   district     court’s    order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
    his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
    of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 
    403 U.S. 388
     (1971), without
    prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.                   Akins
    also appeals the district court’s order denying his subsequent Fed.
    R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.         We have reviewed the record and find no
    reversible error.        Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
    orders.       See Akins v. United States, 3:04-cv-23200-MBS (D.S.C.
    filed Mar. 22, 2006 & entered Mar. 23, 2006; filed May 1, 2006 &
    entered May 2, 2006).         We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts   and    legal    contentions   are     adequately   presented       in   the
    materials      before   the   court   and     argument   would    not   aid     the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 3 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-6979

Filed Date: 10/2/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021