Caudill v. CCBCC, Inc. , 386 F. App'x 415 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-2055
    KATRINA LYNN CAUDILL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CCBCC, INC., a corporation,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Charleston.  John T. Copenhaver,
    Jr., District Judge. (2:08-cv-01202)
    Submitted:   June 4, 2010                   Decided:   June 29, 2010
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    William Douglas Witten, Donald C. Wandling, AVIS, WITTEN &
    WANDLING, L.C., Logan, West Virginia, for Appellant. Eric W.
    Iskra, Alyesha P. Asghar, SPILMAN THOMAS & BATTLE, PLLC,
    Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Katrina      Lynn     Caudill       appeals    the    district     court’s
    order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer
    in this employment discrimination action.                      We have reviewed the
    record and find no reversible error.                Accordingly, we affirm for
    the reasons stated by the district court.                        Caudill v. CCBCC,
    Inc., 
    651 F. Supp. 2d 499
     (S.D. W. Va. 2009); see also Wahi v.
    Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 
    562 F.3d 599
    , 617 (4th Cir.
    2009) (“[A] plaintiff may not raise new claims after discovery
    has begun without amending [her] complaint.”) (collecting cases
    from other circuits adopting rule), cert. denied, 
    130 S. Ct. 1140
     (2010); Swears v. R.M. Roach & Sons, __ S.E.2d __, 
    2010 WL 1839408
        (W.     Va.    2010)    (setting       forth    elements     of    wrongful
    discharge       claim    based    upon   violation        of    substantial    public
    policy).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions      are     adequately      presented      in   the    materials
    before    the    court    and     argument      would   not     aid   the   decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-2055

Citation Numbers: 386 F. App'x 415

Judges: King, Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Wilkinson

Filed Date: 6/29/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023