United States v. Kelsey Kinard ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-4494
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KELSEY LENTRELL KINARD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:07-cr-00486-TLW-2)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelsey Lentrell Kinard, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley
Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Rose Mary Parham,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Kelsey Lentrell Kinard appeals the district court’s
amended judgment granting the Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P.
35(b) motion. To the extent that Kinard’s claim that the
district court failed to consider various factors in determining
the extent of the sentence reduction challenges the lawfulness
of the district court’s sentencing methodology, we have
jurisdiction over Kinard’s appeal. See United States v. Davis,
679 F.3d 190, 194 (4th Cir. 2012). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2